FTC orders Uber, Walmart, Delta and six others to explain personalized pricing and pay
The FTC ordered nine companies, including Delta, Uber and Walmart, on 28 October 2026 to explain whether algorithms use personal data to set prices or pay.
By Berkant A.Published
Tech AI LatestThe US Federal Trade Commission voted 2-0 on 28 October 2026 to send Section 6(b) orders to nine companies: Delta, United, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target and Walmart. They must explain whether prices or worker pay vary from person to person based on loyalty programs or analysis of personal data by what the FTC calls superintelligence algorithms, and document the inputs and tools used. Answers are due within 45 days of receipt.
Key facts
- Announced: 28 October 2026 by the FTC; the Commission vote was 2-0
- Recipients: Delta, United, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target and Walmart
- Scope: personalized prices for consumers and personalized pay for ride-share and delivery workers
- Legal basis: Section 6(b) of the FTC Act; responses due 45 days after receipt
- Wording: the release refers to analysis of personal data by superintelligence algorithms
- Not stated: whether any recipient is suspected of breaking the law
What the FTC ordered
The Federal Trade Commission said on 28 October 2026 that it had ordered nine companies to provide information on whether they use personal data to set the prices consumers pay or the compensation workers receive. The recipients are three airlines, Delta, United and JetBlue; two ride-share companies, Lyft and Uber; two delivery companies, DoorDash and Instacart; and two retailers, Target and Walmart.
The orders ask whether prices vary from person to person based on factors such as loyalty program membership and analysis of personal data by superintelligence algorithms. For ride-share and food delivery firms, the FTC says driver pay may vary based on data such as phone usage or the history of accepted offers. Each company must document the inputs, tools and procedures it uses to set or adjust prices and pay. The Commission voted 2-0 to issue the orders.
How a 6(b) study works
Section 6(b) of the FTC Act lets the agency run broad studies without a specific law enforcement purpose. Recipients have 45 days from receipt to respond, and the FTC can go to federal court to compel compliance. The FTC says this study targets the companies that actually set prices, unlike its 2024 study, which looked at the consultancies and middlemen that sell pricing tools. The release also points to a request for public comment, opened in August, on a proposed enforcement policy statement about undisclosed use of personal data in pricing.
Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson said the agency intends to scrutinize the opaque methodology some companies in these industries may be using, and that consumers deserve to know whether companies use their web surfing habits or other personal data to estimate the highest price they can charge.
Why it matters
Personalized pricing and algorithmic pay are among the most direct ways machine learning reaches consumers and gig workers, and both are hard to see from the outside. A 6(b) study does not accuse anyone of wrongdoing, but it gives the FTC detailed internal documents it can later use for a report, a policy statement or enforcement. The phrase superintelligence algorithms follows Executive Order 14434, which tells federal agencies to use Super Intelligence in place of artificial intelligence in their documents. More US rules are tracked in AI Policy & Regulation.
What to watch next
Responses are due 45 days after each company receives its order, which points to mid December 2026. The FTC has not said when it will publish findings, and the release does not say whether the August policy statement will be finalized first. None of the nine companies' responses are stated in the announcement.
What changed
| Before | The FTC had studied pricing consultancies in 2024 and proposed a policy statement on undisclosed personal data pricing in August 2026 |
|---|---|
| After | Nine airlines, platforms and retailers must document how they set individual prices and pay, under compulsory 6(b) orders |
| Who it affects | Consumers, ride-share and delivery workers, and companies that use personal data in pricing or pay algorithms |
Questions people ask
- Which companies received the FTC personalized pricing orders?
- Delta, United, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target and Walmart, according to the FTC's 28 October 2026 release.
- Is the FTC accusing these companies of breaking the law?
- No. A Section 6(b) study gathers information without a specific law enforcement purpose. The FTC can, however, use what it learns in later policy or enforcement work.
- Why does the FTC say superintelligence algorithms?
- Executive Order 14434 of 29 September 2026 directs federal agencies to use Super Intelligence in place of artificial intelligence in their own documents.
Sources
- FTC Launches Personalized Pricing and Compensation Inquiry (Federal Trade Commission, 28 Oct 2026)
Reference pages
Spotted an error? See the corrections policy and tell the editor. Facts in this story come from the sources listed above; vendor claims are attributed.
Comments
Loading comments.





